"...At Variance With The Truth."

"The Board believes that your testimony was at variance with the truth."

What a wonderfully tactful way of calling out Sherry Ray for her dishonesty.

And the second Riverside County officials are forced to admit this transcript exists -- documenting the maliciousness and dishonest hate with which Sherry Ray and Jack Ray conspired to deprive a woman of her son -- is the second when all of the rest of their lies regarding their March, 2004, kidnapping of the same child at the request of Jack Ray will become exposed.

Simply stated:  Jack and Sherry were morally bankrupt criminals completely lacking in any integrity or credibility.  Riverside County DPSS chose not to exercise any due diligence in their haste to reward Jack for crying on their shoulders.

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT BOARD OF RIGHTS HEARING

(In re:  SHERRY M. RAY  #23572)

DECISION OF THE BOARD

(September 12, 1994)

Page 472, Line 7 through Line 10:

"The Board believes that your testimony was at variance with the truth.   The Board was, quite frankly, disappointed that you have not taken responsibility for your actions." (emphasis added)

It doesn't answer the question of how Sherry's bankruptcy and ensuing financial difficulties were the fault of the woman she and Jack victimized, but at least we know where Jackie gets his 'not taking responsibility for your actions'  from.